-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 59
[hyperactor] channel-level ping-pong benchmarks #906
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
This is an attempt to do an apples-to-apples comparison to P1903314366, to eliminate any non-channel related overheads. The results replicate previous findings: that our throughput is hampered by excess data copies (either outright or through growing buffers in the encoding stack), and of tokio-level network i/o overheads. Both are being addressed. These benchmarks should help to serve as validation as this work lands. Differential Revision: [D80260732](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D80260732/) [ghstack-poisoned]
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D80260732 |
This is an attempt to do an apples-to-apples comparison to P1903314366, to eliminate any non-channel related overheads. The results replicate previous findings: that our throughput is hampered by excess data copies (either outright or through growing buffers in the encoding stack), and of tokio-level network i/o overheads. Both are being addressed. These benchmarks should help to serve as validation as this work lands. Differential Revision: [D80260732](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D80260732/) [ghstack-poisoned]
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D80260732 |
This is an attempt to do an apples-to-apples comparison to P1903314366, to eliminate any non-channel related overheads. The results replicate previous findings: that our throughput is hampered by excess data copies (either outright or through growing buffers in the encoding stack), and of tokio-level network i/o overheads. Both are being addressed. These benchmarks should help to serve as validation as this work lands. Differential Revision: [D80260732](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D80260732/) [ghstack-poisoned]
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D80260732 |
This is an attempt to do an apples-to-apples comparison to P1903314366, to eliminate any non-channel related overheads. The results replicate previous findings: that our throughput is hampered by excess data copies (either outright or through growing buffers in the encoding stack), and of tokio-level network i/o overheads. Both are being addressed. These benchmarks should help to serve as validation as this work lands. Differential Revision: [D80260732](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D80260732/) [ghstack-poisoned]
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D80260732 |
Summary: This is an attempt to do an apples-to-apples comparison to P1903314366, to eliminate any non-channel related overheads. The results replicate previous findings: that our throughput is hampered by excess data copies (either outright or through growing buffers in the encoding stack), and of tokio-level network i/o overheads. Both are being addressed. These benchmarks should help to serve as validation as this work lands. ghstack-source-id: 303773788 exported-using-ghexport Reviewed By: highker, vidhyav Differential Revision: D80260732
Summary: This is an attempt to do an apples-to-apples comparison to P1903314366, to eliminate any non-channel related overheads. The results replicate previous findings: that our throughput is hampered by excess data copies (either outright or through growing buffers in the encoding stack), and of tokio-level network i/o overheads. Both are being addressed. These benchmarks should help to serve as validation as this work lands. ghstack-source-id: 303773788 exported-using-ghexport Reviewed By: highker, vidhyav Differential Revision: D80260732
This is an attempt to do an apples-to-apples comparison to P1903314366, to eliminate any non-channel related overheads. The results replicate previous findings: that our throughput is hampered by excess data copies (either outright or through growing buffers in the encoding stack), and of tokio-level network i/o overheads. Both are being addressed. These benchmarks should help to serve as validation as this work lands. Differential Revision: [D80260732](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D80260732/) [ghstack-poisoned]
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D80260732 |
Summary: Pull Request resolved: meta-pytorch#906 This is an attempt to do an apples-to-apples comparison to P1903314366, to eliminate any non-channel related overheads. The results replicate previous findings: that our throughput is hampered by excess data copies (either outright or through growing buffers in the encoding stack), and of tokio-level network i/o overheads. Both are being addressed. These benchmarks should help to serve as validation as this work lands. ghstack-source-id: 303699220 exported-using-ghexport Differential Revision: D80260732 Reviewed By: highker, vidhyav
Summary: Pull Request resolved: meta-pytorch#906 This is an attempt to do an apples-to-apples comparison to P1903314366, to eliminate any non-channel related overheads. The results replicate previous findings: that our throughput is hampered by excess data copies (either outright or through growing buffers in the encoding stack), and of tokio-level network i/o overheads. Both are being addressed. These benchmarks should help to serve as validation as this work lands. ghstack-source-id: 303699220 exported-using-ghexport Differential Revision: D80260732 Reviewed By: highker, vidhyav
Summary: This is an attempt to do an apples-to-apples comparison to P1903314366, to eliminate any non-channel related overheads. The results replicate previous findings: that our throughput is hampered by excess data copies (either outright or through growing buffers in the encoding stack), and of tokio-level network i/o overheads. Both are being addressed. These benchmarks should help to serve as validation as this work lands. ghstack-source-id: 303814001 exported-using-ghexport Reviewed By: highker, vidhyav Differential Revision: D80260732
Summary: This is an attempt to do an apples-to-apples comparison to P1903314366, to eliminate any non-channel related overheads. The results replicate previous findings: that our throughput is hampered by excess data copies (either outright or through growing buffers in the encoding stack), and of tokio-level network i/o overheads. Both are being addressed. These benchmarks should help to serve as validation as this work lands. ghstack-source-id: 303814001 exported-using-ghexport Reviewed By: highker, vidhyav Differential Revision: D80260732
Summary: This is an attempt to do an apples-to-apples comparison to P1903314366, to eliminate any non-channel related overheads. The results replicate previous findings: that our throughput is hampered by excess data copies (either outright or through growing buffers in the encoding stack), and of tokio-level network i/o overheads. Both are being addressed. These benchmarks should help to serve as validation as this work lands. ghstack-source-id: 303814001 exported-using-ghexport Reviewed By: highker, vidhyav Differential Revision: D80260732
Summary: This is an attempt to do an apples-to-apples comparison to P1903314366, to eliminate any non-channel related overheads. The results replicate previous findings: that our throughput is hampered by excess data copies (either outright or through growing buffers in the encoding stack), and of tokio-level network i/o overheads. Both are being addressed. These benchmarks should help to serve as validation as this work lands. ghstack-source-id: 303814001 exported-using-ghexport Reviewed By: highker, vidhyav Differential Revision: D80260732
Summary: This is an attempt to do an apples-to-apples comparison to P1903314366, to eliminate any non-channel related overheads. The results replicate previous findings: that our throughput is hampered by excess data copies (either outright or through growing buffers in the encoding stack), and of tokio-level network i/o overheads. Both are being addressed. These benchmarks should help to serve as validation as this work lands. ghstack-source-id: 303814001 exported-using-ghexport Reviewed By: highker, vidhyav Differential Revision: D80260732
Summary: Pull Request resolved: meta-pytorch#906 This is an attempt to do an apples-to-apples comparison to P1903314366, to eliminate any non-channel related overheads. The results replicate previous findings: that our throughput is hampered by excess data copies (either outright or through growing buffers in the encoding stack), and of tokio-level network i/o overheads. Both are being addressed. These benchmarks should help to serve as validation as this work lands. ghstack-source-id: 303699220 exported-using-ghexport Differential Revision: D80260732 Reviewed By: highker, vidhyav
Summary: This is an attempt to do an apples-to-apples comparison to P1903314366, to eliminate any non-channel related overheads. The results replicate previous findings: that our throughput is hampered by excess data copies (either outright or through growing buffers in the encoding stack), and of tokio-level network i/o overheads. Both are being addressed. These benchmarks should help to serve as validation as this work lands. ghstack-source-id: 303814001 exported-using-ghexport Reviewed By: highker, vidhyav Differential Revision: D80260732
Summary: This is an attempt to do an apples-to-apples comparison to P1903314366, to eliminate any non-channel related overheads. The results replicate previous findings: that our throughput is hampered by excess data copies (either outright or through growing buffers in the encoding stack), and of tokio-level network i/o overheads. Both are being addressed. These benchmarks should help to serve as validation as this work lands. ghstack-source-id: 303814001 exported-using-ghexport Reviewed By: highker, vidhyav Differential Revision: D80260732
Summary: This is an attempt to do an apples-to-apples comparison to P1903314366, to eliminate any non-channel related overheads. The results replicate previous findings: that our throughput is hampered by excess data copies (either outright or through growing buffers in the encoding stack), and of tokio-level network i/o overheads. Both are being addressed. These benchmarks should help to serve as validation as this work lands. ghstack-source-id: 303814001 exported-using-ghexport Reviewed By: highker, vidhyav Differential Revision: D80260732
Summary: This is an attempt to do an apples-to-apples comparison to P1903314366, to eliminate any non-channel related overheads. The results replicate previous findings: that our throughput is hampered by excess data copies (either outright or through growing buffers in the encoding stack), and of tokio-level network i/o overheads. Both are being addressed. These benchmarks should help to serve as validation as this work lands. ghstack-source-id: 303814001 exported-using-ghexport Reviewed By: highker, vidhyav Differential Revision: D80260732
Summary: This is an attempt to do an apples-to-apples comparison to P1903314366, to eliminate any non-channel related overheads. The results replicate previous findings: that our throughput is hampered by excess data copies (either outright or through growing buffers in the encoding stack), and of tokio-level network i/o overheads. Both are being addressed. These benchmarks should help to serve as validation as this work lands. ghstack-source-id: 303814001 exported-using-ghexport Reviewed By: highker, vidhyav Differential Revision: D80260732
Summary: This is an attempt to do an apples-to-apples comparison to P1903314366, to eliminate any non-channel related overheads. The results replicate previous findings: that our throughput is hampered by excess data copies (either outright or through growing buffers in the encoding stack), and of tokio-level network i/o overheads. Both are being addressed. These benchmarks should help to serve as validation as this work lands. ghstack-source-id: 303814001 exported-using-ghexport Reviewed By: highker, vidhyav Differential Revision: D80260732
This is an attempt to do an apples-to-apples comparison to P1903314366, to eliminate any non-channel related overheads. The results replicate previous findings: that our throughput is hampered by excess data copies (either outright or through growing buffers in the encoding stack), and of tokio-level network i/o overheads. Both are being addressed. These benchmarks should help to serve as validation as this work lands. Differential Revision: [D80260732](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D80260732/) [ghstack-poisoned]
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D80260732 |
Summary: This is an attempt to do an apples-to-apples comparison to P1903314366, to eliminate any non-channel related overheads. The results replicate previous findings: that our throughput is hampered by excess data copies (either outright or through growing buffers in the encoding stack), and of tokio-level network i/o overheads. Both are being addressed. These benchmarks should help to serve as validation as this work lands. ghstack-source-id: 304032339 exported-using-ghexport Reviewed By: highker, vidhyav Differential Revision: D80260732
Summary: This is an attempt to do an apples-to-apples comparison to P1903314366, to eliminate any non-channel related overheads. The results replicate previous findings: that our throughput is hampered by excess data copies (either outright or through growing buffers in the encoding stack), and of tokio-level network i/o overheads. Both are being addressed. These benchmarks should help to serve as validation as this work lands. ghstack-source-id: 304032339 exported-using-ghexport Reviewed By: highker, vidhyav Differential Revision: D80260732
Summary: This is an attempt to do an apples-to-apples comparison to P1903314366, to eliminate any non-channel related overheads. The results replicate previous findings: that our throughput is hampered by excess data copies (either outright or through growing buffers in the encoding stack), and of tokio-level network i/o overheads. Both are being addressed. These benchmarks should help to serve as validation as this work lands. ghstack-source-id: 304032339 exported-using-ghexport Reviewed By: highker, vidhyav Differential Revision: D80260732
Summary: This is an attempt to do an apples-to-apples comparison to P1903314366, to eliminate any non-channel related overheads. The results replicate previous findings: that our throughput is hampered by excess data copies (either outright or through growing buffers in the encoding stack), and of tokio-level network i/o overheads. Both are being addressed. These benchmarks should help to serve as validation as this work lands. ghstack-source-id: 304032339 exported-using-ghexport Reviewed By: highker, vidhyav Differential Revision: D80260732
Summary: This is an attempt to do an apples-to-apples comparison to P1903314366, to eliminate any non-channel related overheads. The results replicate previous findings: that our throughput is hampered by excess data copies (either outright or through growing buffers in the encoding stack), and of tokio-level network i/o overheads. Both are being addressed. These benchmarks should help to serve as validation as this work lands. ghstack-source-id: 304032339 exported-using-ghexport Reviewed By: highker, vidhyav Differential Revision: D80260732
Summary: This is an attempt to do an apples-to-apples comparison to P1903314366, to eliminate any non-channel related overheads. The results replicate previous findings: that our throughput is hampered by excess data copies (either outright or through growing buffers in the encoding stack), and of tokio-level network i/o overheads. Both are being addressed. These benchmarks should help to serve as validation as this work lands. ghstack-source-id: 304032339 exported-using-ghexport Reviewed By: highker, vidhyav Differential Revision: D80260732
Summary: This is an attempt to do an apples-to-apples comparison to P1903314366, to eliminate any non-channel related overheads. The results replicate previous findings: that our throughput is hampered by excess data copies (either outright or through growing buffers in the encoding stack), and of tokio-level network i/o overheads. Both are being addressed. These benchmarks should help to serve as validation as this work lands. ghstack-source-id: 304032339 exported-using-ghexport Reviewed By: highker, vidhyav Differential Revision: D80260732
Summary: This is an attempt to do an apples-to-apples comparison to P1903314366, to eliminate any non-channel related overheads. The results replicate previous findings: that our throughput is hampered by excess data copies (either outright or through growing buffers in the encoding stack), and of tokio-level network i/o overheads. Both are being addressed. These benchmarks should help to serve as validation as this work lands. ghstack-source-id: 304032339 exported-using-ghexport Reviewed By: highker, vidhyav Differential Revision: D80260732
This pull request has been merged in 72b2ed7. |
Stack from ghstack (oldest at bottom):
Message
#852This is an attempt to do an apples-to-apples comparison to P1903314366, to eliminate any non-channel related overheads.
The results replicate previous findings: that our throughput is hampered by excess data copies (either outright or through growing buffers in the encoding stack), and of tokio-level network i/o overheads. Both are being addressed. These benchmarks should help to serve as validation as this work lands.
Differential Revision: D80260732